Kosho-Kai Karate Family Martial Arts and Fitness Center

Wow, last month was a doozy.  I'll try to keep February down to two hundred words or less.  So far no one has been bold enough to come right out and ask if it's my participation in karate for the past thirty years that has caused my hip problems.  But I have sensed (or perhaps imagined) that it's been on the minds of many.  It would be ironic, wouldn't it?  Martial arts is supposed to keep you slim and trim and flexible and fast.  In fact, there's no better fitness training (for a complete list of fitness modalities see January's article on fitness).  On the other hand, I know many martial artists who have had joint replacements and many others who have permanent limps or disabilities presumably as a result of their training.  As many of you know, I began experiencing problems with my left hip back in 2004, had arthroscopy performed on it last year, and just recently underwent a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing procedure.  What's up with that?  I thought martial arts was supposed to promote lifelong health and fitness?  I have called into question my training methods.  Do I stretch too much or incorrectly?  Have I kicked the heavy bag too often?  How about supplemental conditioning?  Have I run too many miles in the Army?  Maybe Crossfit did me in?  As an instructor and leader, these are serious concerns for me.  It would be unconscienable to train others to do things that would lead them to injury or early disability.  Well rest assured that nothing I've done or taught to others has been inheritently unhealthy.  As it turns out, my left hip accetabulum (socket), according to my surgeon, was extremely shallow.  It was this malformity that led to the premature degradation of my cartilage.  Only time will tell if my right hip suffers from similar structural shortcomings, but my left hip, once rehabilitated will be better than it was before.  Good news indeed!  Now, I can't speak for my colleagues who have been ravaged by similar maladies, but if I had to wager a guess, I'd say they too aggravated existing conditions that an otherwise healthy person would never have been afflicted with given the same type, frequency, and intensity of physical activity.  So, fear not and train hard.  I'll be seeing you on the mat soon. 

January 28, 2012.  I've spent some time as of late perusing the websites of karate and martial arts friends and brethren (and a few strangers), and I've noticed an emerging trend.  That trend is to redefine arts and school curricula in terms of combat effectiveness in all situations.  In order to do this, many have taken to combining skill sets from various disciplines.  On one site, a senior instructor with a red belt (must be pretty high up there) explains on a video how his art combines karate strikes and kicks, judo throws, jujitsu joint locks, and jiu-jutsu ground techniques to attain a complete fighting art.  This seems to be an increasingly popular method of training.  Now, let me clearly state that there is absolutely nothing wrong with this approach.  Nor is it new; I visited schools in the eighties that had similar syllabi.  I do believe that the proliferation of MMA as a sport has awakened a desire for martial artists to "round out" their game, so to speak.  Again, there's nothing wrong with that.  For effective self-defense, one must possess skills at all ranges of engagement and in all types of situations.  What's interesting about such proclamations is the assertion that arts such as jujitsu and its cousin aikijitsu don't contain strikes or that karate doesn't contain grappling techniques.  In fact, when one researches the historical development of these combative (martial or civil) arts, one finds that they were originally complete systems with inclusive arsenols of percussive and leverage-based techniques.  What separated them from one another wasn't the techniques they contained but rather the strategies they employed.  Take jujitsu for example.  Jujitsu was the hand-to-hand combative system used by samurai on the field of battle.  Certain techniques such as atemi waza (striking technique) were of less value against an armor-wearing opponent than say nage waza (throwing technique) or shime waza (choking technique).  Likewise, ne waza (ground technique) was not extnsively trained, for what more vulnerable situation is there for a warrior than a grappling match on the ground when there are spear weilding mounted cavalry about?  In addition, professional warriors always carry backup weapons.  Would you advise a juji-gatame (cross-body arm lock) against someone with a knife in their boot?  This does not mean jujitsu did not contain strikes.  On the contrary, jujitsu originally made judicious use of strikes to off-balance and set up one's opponent for throws and kansetsu waza (joint attacking technique).  Similarly, ne waza was certainly practiced, but not for the purpose of submitting one's opponent as much as for getting back to one's feet or for drawing an edged weapon to finish the fight.  On the other hand, the Okinawan art that evolved into karate was a civil self-protection art developed by aristocrats in a society where personal weapons of any kind were prohibited.  This required a mindset and considerations entriely different from those of a soldier at war.  The dominant strategy was to defend against all kinds of attacks, e.g. grabbing, striking, multiple-attacker, etc. and quickly rendering one's attacker incapable of furthering his assault.  So why have these systems become identified solely by the techniques favored by their primary strategies?  Why today do some schools of jujitsu and karate feel it necessary to mix and borrow to become more combat effective?  I feel there are two reasons.  The first is art-ification/sport-ification.  As the Japanese martial arts became a popular worldwide obsession, their identities became more narrowly focused on non-survival objectives such as self-development and competition.  Both of these pursuits favor specialization.  For instance, judoka naturally spend most of their time working on nage waza (throwing technique) since that's the primary way to score points in a judo match.  The other reason has to do with the strategy-based training methodologies of the systems.  Japanese-style pedagogy is strictly structured so that students achieve high levels of proficiency in fundamentals before going on to learn more extraneous skills.  Fundamentals are the skills that most directly enable the core strategy of the system.  In jujitsu, it's the throws, chokes, and devastating joint destroying attacks that enabled the samurai to defeat enemy soldiers in combat.   In karate, close-quarter blocks, traps, and strikes offer the best protection against a thug trying to steal your money. Too often, practitioners learn only the fundamental levels before going on to start schools and teach students of their own.  They simply never become proficient with the supplemental techniques of their art.  They, in essence, become specialists, not complete fighters.  Make no mistake about it - real combat punishes specialists.  A thorough examination of karate shows that it contains a plethora of choking, throwing, joint-locking, and ground fighting techniques secondary to and in support of the primary strategic emphasis on striking.  Ironically, eclectic schools that purport incorporating skills from other arts do so at the expense of a unifying core strategy.  They might very well come to identify a strategic preference for dealing with violent assaults and eventually allow the less important skills to deteriorate to a point of non-existence.  It's at this point that they may identify their short comings and, once again, begin looking outside their art for help, thus starting the cycle over again.  True classical or traditional arts taught by informed instructors contain everything you need for self-defense.  What's the take away?  Simple.  When shopping for a school that offers effective, practical solutions to real violent encounters, try to identify if the instructors 1) recognize the need for all categories of offensive and defensive skills at every range of combat and 2) can describe their core strategy for self-protection (not simply a preference for kicking or grappling).    

December got away from me, but I'm back on track now.  Speaking of on track, hopefully everyone made a new year's resolution to improve the quality of their life in some manner.  Maybe to get more fit, to read more books, or to spend more time relaxing, praying, meditating, or going to church.  There is a possibility that whatever commitment you decided to make has already been broken due to any number of unforseen interruptions.  Not to despair.  I have a strategy that I use that you may find helpful.  Instead of a new year's resolution, I make quarterly resolutions.  This gives me the opportunity to measure my progress and reevaluate my goals.  It never fails.  I make a commitment to a new diet plan or workout routine.  It goes well for a few weeks, then BAM, I get knocked off my feet by the flu or a bad cold.  Or, I get snatched up for an unexpected training mission with the Army.  Instead of abandoning my resolution, I simply use the beginning of the next quarter as a reset button.  Often this allows me the chance to tweek what I was doing and make it even better.  As martial artists, we owe it to ourselves to be in the best shape we can possibly be in.  No matter whether your primary focus is self-improvement, self protection, or sport competition, karate requires us to be fit to fight.  Many join karate hoping to get into better shape.  Initially they notice improvements to their strength, stamina, flexibility, and body composition.  Later, however, they hit a plateau and can't seem to make any gains.  The truth is karate class two or three days a week is not sufficient to get us into the condition we need to be in.  I highly encourage you to take up a supplemental conditioning program to help you meet your fitness needs as a martial artist.  I would like to suggest some guidelines for practical and effective conditioning:

• High Intensity. Your workouts should be fast paced and challenging.  Lifting weights for fifteen minutes out of an hour spent in the gym is a waste of time.  If you're not completely exhausted at the end of your session, you are not getting the maximum benefit from your time investment.
• Variety.  The best workout routine is no routine at all.  In fact, routine is the enemy of true fitness.  Being fit means having proficiency in all ten modalities of fitness: endurance, strength, stamina (no, it's not the same thing as endurance), balance, flexibility, agility, accuracy, speed, power (no, it's not the same thing as strength), and coordination.  A good program will hit all of these while challenging you and keeping you from getting bored.
• Functional.  Keep all your movements functional.  This means using muscle groups together in complex movements that complement the natural way your body accomplishes work.  A general test you can use to determine if a movement is functional is if it causes at least two joints to work simultaneously, it's functional e.g. shoulder and elbow, or hip and knee.  Isolation movements such as bicep curls develop muscles disproportionally to one another and retard coordinated and efficient movement; not exactly what you want in a fight.  Or in any athletic endeavor for that matter.  A little isolation work is okay, but for every isolation movement you do, you should do three functional ones.
• Fun.  The key to sticking with anything is having fun.  If your perspective on working out is that it's boring, try something entirely new.  If lifting weights is boring to you, try playing a sport instead.  For many of us, karate (kata, sparring, bag and mit work, etc.) along with some running and body weight exercises is the perfect prescription.  For others, lifting weights, circuit training, or a sport like racket ball does the trick.

Next, I would like to recommend three fitness options that we at the Kosho-kai have used and can attest to the effectiveness of:

• Crossfit.  Crossfit is the ultimate in physical fitness.  It delivers high intensity workouts that cross all ten fitness domains.  The workouts combine elements of gymnastics, running, and Olympic style weight lifting.  The WOD's (Workout of the Day) are described in detail along with video demonstrations on their website www.crossfit.com.  Most WOD's tend to be relatively short (eight to twenty minutes) but will take everything you've got to finish. All workouts are scalable to any level of ability and scaled versions are readily available on the Brand X link on the site.  One drawback to Crossfit is the relatively large time investment required to master some of the movements and lifts which can be quite technical.
• P90X.  This is the brainchild of personal trainer Tony Horton and the marketing genius of the Beachbody Corporation.  It combines elemets from weight lifting, body weight training, yoga, kempo, and plyometrics into one diverse and challenging program.  It uses the concept of muscle confusion which basically prevents your muscles from adapting to the exercises by constantly varying the type and intensity of the movements.  Unlike Crossfit, P90X demands little technical know how; you simply put in the DVD and follow along.  P90X definitely delivers results, however, one drawback is the length of the workouts.  They take between 60 and 90 minutes every day, five to six days per week.  Mrs. Fink leads sessions nearly every day.  Class size is limited, but the DVD's, workout room, and TV are available for any student's use any time the dojo is open.
• Total Gym.  If you've ever watched Mr. Norris and Miss Brinkley extoling the virtues of the Total Gym on their infomercial and wondered if it was as effective as they portray it to be, wonder no longer.  I bought one at Sears five years ago for $290, and I can say it's been the best piece of fitness equipment I've ever owned.  It uses a glide board that adjusts to seven different angles, allowing you to use from 10 to 70 percent of your body weight.  Mine also came with a weight bar attachment which allows me to add up to eighty pounds of additional weight.  The machine allows you to replicate any movement you can do with free weights or practically any other piece of equipment.  There are several beginner, intermediate, and advanced workouts that are targeted to three fitness goals: weight loss, strength, and endurance.  The Total Gym is in the fitness room of the dojo and is available to students any time Mr. Fink isn't using it.

Hopefully, these tips and suggestions informed and motivated you to step up your conditioning program.  For more information about any of these programs, see Mr. or Mrs Fink. We'd be happy to help you establish and meet your own personal fitness goals.   

This month's thought to ponder is focused on intermediate level students, those from orange to green belt, but can be just as valuable to beginners or instructors who teach beginners and intermediate grade students.  In the first two Tomari kata taught in our dojo, Wansu and Anaku, there are several instances where we are taught to step forward while executing an uke-waza (blocking technique).  Specifically, Wansu has seven occurences and Anaku has six.  Likewise, the Pinan kata all prominantly feature blocking techniques simultaneously executed with forward steps.  The first Goju-ryu kata, although less frequently (Geki-sai dai ichi contains two and Geki-sai dai ni contains three), also show forward moving blocks.  What could be the explanation for this?  When someone launches a punch at you or commits some similar aggressive action, our natural response is to flinch away and raise our hands defensively.  Whereas this protects us from the blow, it does nothing to gain us any tactical advantage or protect us from the onslaught that is sure to follow.  A far better, albeit less natural, response is to violently attack our aggressor's oncoming limb.  And, the closer to the point of connection to the torso, the better.  I recall the words of my Wing-chun Sifu, George Vance, "When you see movement, strike straight at it."  The problem with our thinking in this matter lies in our interpretation of "uke-waza" as "blocking technique", whereas in fact it is more correctly translated as "technique to receive", i.e. think of all blocks in our kata as strikes instead.  Our aim is to: 1. cut off the technique before it can achieve maximum power, 2. move inside the optimum range of the strike, 3. strike with enough force as to disrupt the attacker's balance, and 4. create an opening by which we can execute a counter attack.  Through our kata we aim not to replace our God-given reflexes, but rather to enhance them by wiring a more efficient flinch-response into our muscle memory, one that puts us immediately on the road to a decisive victory.  How do we do this?  Why through repetition, of course.  So, with that in mind, let's run it five more times!   

In many dojo, kata is practiced exhaustively, and bunkai is developed to "fit" the movements of the kata.  Too frequently, the applications formulated are of the punch/block variety.  It occurred to me long ago that many of the movements shown in kata are clearly not intended to be percussive techniques, but rather close-quarter fighting tactics such as trapping, locking, throwing, choking, etc.  As many of you know, I spend considerable time cross training with functional martial artists, i.e. judo-ka, jujitsu-ka, as well as with law enforcement and military defensive tactics and combatives instructors.  Most of these people wouldn't know a kata if it bit them on the hiney, but their understanding of combative movement and application is phenominal.  The insight I've garnered from training with these folks has prompted me to re-examine my kata and "find" effective self-defense applications that, ironically, they seem to know better than we karate-ka.  Since there is no one alive who can legitimately claim to be in possession of knowledge of the original intent of the founding masters, and since there are very few written records of karate history to defer to, modern sensei must act a bit like archaeologists or detectives piecing together the clearest possible explanation for kata and their meaning that we can.  There is one school of thought that even suggests that the oldest surviving kata were developed as spiritual/meditative exercises and did not originally have combative application whatsoever.  One particularly worthwhile essay on this matter is Nathan Johnson's book Barefoot Zen.  Mr. Johnson asserts that nahanchi, sanchin, and tensho kata, which he collectively calls "key forms", were originally practiced by monks both as solo exercises and as partner flow drills.  The exchanges were not for fighting or self-protection.  Rather, they were meant to impart the ability to blend with and harmonize with energy instead of resisting it.  In this way, it was believed, one could learn to transcend the forces of this world and reach an enlightened state.  What do you think?  Were kata originally developed for non-martial purposes?  Did the old masters devise effective self-defense strategies and record them in the kata, or did they invent kata as general combative exercises and leave interpretation up to the individual practitioner?  Please share your thoughts.